Generally speaking, social networks were the most heavily used in younger generations, while radio represented the highest figure in older age legions. Additionally,statistics recorded showed microblogging was the least utilized.
The chart makes a comparison of the proportion of new sources usage by five particular age factions in 2011.
Generally speaking, social networks were the most heavily used in younger generations, while radio represented the highest figure in older age legions. Additionally,statistics recorded showed microblogging was the least utilized.
Radio was the most efficient source of information for 18 years old or older, compared to social networks with only 4 out of 10 people above the age of 17 used it.
On the other hand, micro blogging only fluctuated around 10% to 25% in all age groups, signaling that it’s not commonly used as a news provider.
Finally, social networks’s figures stood at the top in the younger generation, with roughly 80% of productivity witnessed in two age groups ranging from 10-29 years old. In contrast, this number experienced a gradual drop in the larger age groups, from 50% in the 30s to 49s to just under 30% in the oldest group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-30 | quochung95.ftu2@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The pie chart displays the changes in the proportion of water consumption and the bar chart illustrates the changes in the percentage of water use in Australia in 2004
- Introduction The process in which making clothes from recycled plastic bottles are manufactured can be summarised as follows 56
- The table makes a comparison of the number of tourists in the UK and their average spending over the 5 years period from 2003 to 2008 73
- The pie chart displays the changes in the proportion of water consumption and the bar chart illustrates the changes in the percentage of water use in Australia in 2004
- The chart makes a comparison of the amount of time spent by offspring with their parents on the weekdays and on the weekends in five different age groups 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... five particular age factions in 2011. Generally speaking, social networks were...
^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , statistics
...igure in older age legions. Additionally,statistics recorded showed microblogging was the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07407407407 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07295829818 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691358024691 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6733947071 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392587006175 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176413585382 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172694800797 0.0843802449381 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209663352143 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.241833718099 0.0819641961636 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.