Many think that secondary and high school students should learn money management as it is an important life skill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is an issue of controversy over the magnitude of studying financial literacy in early education. I subscribe to the opinion that financial management subjects bring significant merits.
Firstly, financial education seems to facilitate youngsters’ acquisition of the real value of money. Therefore, teenagers tend to have responsibility and find the optimal way to control their budget. As a consequence, there is a possibility that learners could share financial burdens with their family.
In addition, finance courses seem to be conducive to learners’ professional orientation when they pursue tertiary education. The reason is no sooner do educators teach money concepts than learners might draw inspiration from it. Consequently, there is a chance that the youth are able to apply this sort of knowledge in earning money.
Finally, participating in financial literacy acts as an incentive for young individuals to reap their goals. An explanation is that young generations who gain deeper insight into this kind of subjects might economize money and limit impulse spending. As a result, it is likely that students might have a high tendency to be steward of their own financial futures.
In conclusion, because of financial management being a vital practical skill, I contend that the importance of having a better understanding in financial subjects is undeniable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-31 | Phuong Anh 912 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-07 | newbie3107 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- Many think that secondary and high school students should learn money management as it is an important life skill To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 211.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59241706161 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18374078502 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63981042654 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3718432212 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109459693026 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381614896682 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266419003803 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596342234491 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245005911858 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.