Some people believe that technology has made man more social. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The modern world, undoubtedly is driven by the technology and its advancements that we encounter with each passing day. Everything around is driven by the technology which has sparked the need of the humankind to come together socially and make science do wonders. In my view, technology has made man to be more social by spreading connections, making our lives easier and driving us back together to build the foundations of technology to a greater extent.
Technology helps to connect around the globe in a matter of seconds. This brings in more connections with increase in communication and socialisation amongst the sapiens. For instance, we can sit back at the comfort of our homes and make friends in any country or work remotely for any company that we wish to, thus broadning our circle apart from those whom we encounter physically. I am of the opinion that technology brings us together this way.
Furthermore, technology has made our lives quite simple, leaving us with leisure time that can be spent in socialising. It has made us capable of reducing the workload and putting into prior place the dire need of time for human companionship. For example, one can finsih off tasks at hand more efficiently and early with the help of technology and can take out time to spend with family and friends, fueling the very basic skill of humans, to socialise. I believe that this itself is a very positive outcome of technology.
Moreover, technology on a very basic level, is based on the human minds and their collaboration is what brings in advancements. This helps in coming together of people from a wide range of backgrounds and working together. While all this needs efforts, it brings in the increased need to function together as humankind. For example, whether it be a group of students working on an IT project or scientists trying to develop a machine, both of the activities involve human cooperation, putting into place the need for socialisation.
We are all equipped with our never ending tasks, but technology in a very positive light, helps mankind to develop enhanced relationship and be more social in every possible way. I therefore, strongly agree that technology has made us more social.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-01 | drmona.914 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | thanhtu000 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | SharmisthaNaskar | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | avneet28 | 56 | view |
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 66
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...er it be a group of students working on an IT project or scientists trying to develop...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'projects'?
Suggestion: projects
...be a group of students working on an IT project or scientists trying to develop a machi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97050938338 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86657990743 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522788203753 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7317408404 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.058823529 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278871864398 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961031339005 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06940118843 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15515364884 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058964216846 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.