The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese, Arabic, Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph give us information about four groups of people who uses differnt languages as their mother tongue in Australia from 1986 to 2011.
Overall, the number of people who speak Chinese and Arabic witnessed rapidly rises, with the figure for the former seeing the fastest growth. In addition, the number of Italian and Greek speakers saw a steady drop on all over the pirod of time
Both Chinese and Arabic speakers increased in numbers. Specifically, the former substantialy rose from just around 100,000 in 1986 to over 350,000 in 2011, whilst the latter also witnessed an dramaticly increase, albeit less pronounced, from 50,000 in the year of 1986 to about 150,000 in 2011.
Speakers of the two European languages, in the meantime, underwent opposite patterns. The number of people speaking Greek as their mother tongue fell slightly from around 225,000 in 1988 to about 175,000 in 2011. Similarly, Italian speakers also underwent a drop of approximately 40,000 from 150,000, making Italian the least spoken language of the four after 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | Phamquynhchi1918@gmail.com | 100 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 77 | view |
- Most urgent issues can only be solved by international corporations Do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in prices of three metals during 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the changes to the town of Seaville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teady drop on all over the pirod of time Both Chinese and Arabic speakers increas...
^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed in numbers. Specifically, the former substantialy rose from just around 100,0...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bstantialy rose from just around 100,000 in 1986 to over 350,000 in 2011, whilst ...
^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... 2011, whilst the latter also witnessed an dramaticly increase, albeit less pronou...
^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mother tongue fell slightly from around 225,000 in 1988 to about 175,000 in 2011...
^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...milarly, Italian speakers also underwent a drop of approximately 40,000 from 150,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16374269006 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53820033255 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5651049275 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231441557804 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120680173013 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110393322809 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169099234246 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113712639891 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.