Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Space exploration is a waste of money. Do you agree or disagree?

Since 12th April 1961, when the first spaceship - the Sputnik 1 spacecraft successfully launched in space, the race to discover the mystery of space has never stopped. The governments of powerful nations have spent a considerable amount of money on space exploration, a lot more than the money they use to help improve the quality of citizen’s lives. So personally, I think that space exploration is a total waste of money.
The antagonist believes that the budget used to discover space is meaningful. Because the conditions on Earth have been getting worse every year and they think that finding a new planet is the only option to save humanity from extinction. But to me, those beliefs are quite fictional, unrealistic.
That money should be used to save the environmental problems on Earth. First of all, a pack of seeds only cost about $3, an adult tree has the price of $160. So to build a forest consisting of 100 trees, we only spend about $16000. That seems like a big deal to ordinary people but it’s nothing compared to the budget that the government spent for the space projects. A forest can provide us with fresh air. A forest is also a habitat of hundreds of insects, birds, and mushrooms. A forest is also a shield to prevent soil erosion, flood, house destruction, and death. Only $16000 can save us from natural disasters, lung diseases, losing properties, or loved ones and provide a home for a new ecosystem, that sounds like a worthy investment to me. Furthermore, there are no risks in planting trees at all, so your money is totally safe. But in the space industry, you can’t guarantee anything, a million dollars may also burn with a failed project.
Secondly, the search for new living planets will cause discriminations, racism, class divisions. The moment that a new living planet is discovered, billionaires, millionaires will fight their ways to leave Earth and move to live on planets. They have money, power, so there is nothing that can stop them. But to people who already suffer from poverty, they have no other choice, they can only accept their fate and die with Earth. That’s why space exploration will affect the equality in society and harm the rights of a person.
To conclude, I think that the governments of powerful nations should reduce the budget of space exploration, and truly make the people’s taxes worth it by providing them with a better, equal life, not with a hopeless future for poor people.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-14 Sandeep USA 73 view
2023-10-26 hoaithuongnguyen283 84 view
2023-10-23 hoaithuongnguyen283 78 view
2023-08-12 Manideep Macherla 84 view
2023-08-06 TLan168 78 view
Essays by user nguyendangquan… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...oration, a lot more than the money they use to help improve the quality of citizen’...
^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of all, a pack of seeds only cost about , an adult tree has the price of 60. So t...
^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...dreds of insects, birds, and mushrooms. A forest is also a shield to prevent soil...
^
Line 3, column 887, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... industry, you can’t guarantee anything, a million dollars may also burn with a f...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, i think, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84047619048 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69528695599 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57380952381 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7094242524 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4090909091 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166375051474 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511665153287 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759544994784 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924051852381 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845053111112 0.056905535591 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.