Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone.
Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Some believe that “Teamwork makes dream work.” But some think that they will study better as an individual. Personally, I find each technique has its own benefits and drawbacks.
Studying around hardworking students will help you boost your productivity, as well as your focus, since your friends have drowned themselves in school work, you may find it very hard not to force yourself to do the same thing. That is something that you couldn’t have when you are alone. Studying in groups also fixes your weak points and saves you time. Whenever you can’t solve a math problem, you can ask your friends immediately, and have the answer right away. The situation is also applied to other subjects, your friends can go through the lesson with you to make sure that you completely understand, they might be able to answer all your questions at that moment, so you don’t have to wait until class to ask your teacher, or waste your time searching the Internet. Studying in a group of close friends will also make you feel more comfortable and joyful, and somehow make you like time has passed quickly. Working with others will also increase your flexibility because you have to adjust and adapt to match with your friends.
On the other hand, studying in a group of close friends may be too cozy, warm that you forget about all the assignments that you need to do and spend most of the time talking to the others. Working with intelligent classmates might be the cause of peer pressure and self-doubt. Since they are too good, you find it difficult to communicate and ask them simple questions, or you may be like dumbbells that waste their time, and pull them down. That will lead to negative thoughts, lose focus, as well as self blame. Studying alone will increase your development in thinking. Because you don’t have anyone to rely on, but yourself, so you will have to do whatever it takes to solve the problem. During that process, you may develop deeper thinking, understand the problem wider, and find the most suitable way to approach and deal with new ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-13 | PhuongPhoebe | 82 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | hahahahahah | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | phg_phg | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
- Some observers say that police officers should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some educationalists say every child should be taught to play musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 24.0651302605 237% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77222222222 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42812735851 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536111111111 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3475696616 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143498064909 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630319577572 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663360328939 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120133956164 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357573837657 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.