In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Particularly, progress means to be successful by implementing certain ideas or views of people around them. In general, the implementation of a certain process or ideas requires harmony among people who have common thoughts. It is always not true that progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view as it somehow creates a hindrance for further development. Thus, I mostly believe progress requires discussion among people who have mutual thoughts in common.
Firstly, the progress in fields like construction, research, and development require discussion among people who have a common ideology regarding development. For instance- to minimize traffic in the cities, the mayor decided to build a flyover to surpass the vehicle so that there is less congestion in cities road. The advocates of that plan study the feasibility of the construction, its cost estimation, and finally how the flyover really solves the problem of the congestion of traffic. Whereas, the opponent of that plan argue its structure distorts the foundation of the surface weakening the geographical structure.
Secondly, adversity groups always criticize the projects and create hindrances in the development of projects. For instance- in defaming the government the opponent group always criticizes the action taken by the ruling party in developing the cities like managing disposals, proper sanitation, dispatching health services, etc. To make it less popular in governance, the opponent party always excoriates the ruling government project either it is viable in the purpose of the cities or its population creating hindrance in the development of the cities.
Thirdly, some people having negative intentions always want to topple the system making a negative environment inside the working firms. For example- some of the employees in the firm who are antagonizing with the managers always want to defame the manager by blocking his path or actions taken by the manager in properly regulating the firms by showing only negative impacts of that action and making other employees demotivated even if the action is for the well-being of the staffs.
However, some of the contrasting views show positive effects in the development. For example- while developing new medicine to treat disease ineffective way, some critics present negative effects in human beings while testing the medicines saving millions of dollars by prohibiting of the productions of that medicine. Either, it will help the research team to discuss further and changes in the chemical compositions and making the medicine suitable for further uses.
In conclusion, progress particularly derives from the harmony of the group having common thoughts and it is always not true, some of the contrasting views regarding development help to analyze the process and helps to mollify from the effects of that process.
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reas 66
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents should limit the amount of time that children are allowed to use electronic devices like phones tablets and computers Use examples and reasons to support your position 85
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 66
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e problem of the congestion of traffic. Whereas, the opponent of that plan argue its st...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...inside the working firms. For example- some of the employees in the firm who are antagoniz...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...he well-being of the staffs. However, some of the contrasting views show positive effects...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 126, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...mon thoughts and it is always not true, some of the contrasting views regarding development...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2449.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47874720358 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91824312155 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489932885906 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9845822265 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.058823529 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2941176471 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5882352941 5.21951772744 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183791241067 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722262108125 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821898656631 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937518262562 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858312858657 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.