Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, the internet made human lives much easier than in the past. Many companies use the internet in their offices. This essay will explain its advantages and disadvantages and why I think that the advantages of online meetings, discussions and training at factories is superior to disadvantages.
There are a number of disadvantages of conducting online sessions at workplaces. To comments on, one of the major demerits of it, the limitation connection problem, that participants will face when they do have not a good internet connection or come from rural areas. Apart from this, when people attend online training and all, they will distract by other factors such as messages, calls and many more on their devices, this may resulting in a decrement in their focus from the task. For instance, in 2020, over 93% of employees who participated in online training at Google, lost their focus when they had a notification on the screen. This found was in the survey. So, these types of evidence indicate that online meeting rooms will create many obstacles for workers and make them less focused.
On the other hand, online discussions on the internet bring many benefits, which helps companies in many ways. Firstly, it provides flexibility and cost savings methods. When a corporation organizes a meeting, employees join that it from seating at homes anytime, resulting in the company save money from its transportation, electricity bills and much more as well. For example, after successfully applying the online mode in terms of business gatherings in Amazon, this leading them to become one of the most valuable companies in the world. Since their employees now attended meeting at any time from any place. Hence, although the online method decreases physical interactions, its advantages are more beneficial than it.
In conclusion, the online process of doing work in a company will give disadvantages such as increasing less focus on people, but it all save a lot of costs for organisations. In my words, despite having some drawbacks, the online ways for meeting’s benefits far better than it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | nhinhi999 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | david_johnson265 | 74 | view |
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away Causes and problems 78
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 78
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...tation, electricity bills and much more as well. For example, after successfully a...
^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e most valuable companies in the world. Since their employees now attended meeting at...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1778425656 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8676133486 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574344023324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.490743952 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.470588235 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186992997665 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596266883853 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575360957436 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126456778047 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230202020107 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.