Research shows that business meetings, discussions, and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Thanks to the growing cutting-edge technology, the lives of humans have been easier and easier, especially much more convenient for their work. By means of smart devices, business conferences, seminars, or apprenticeships are operated online.
Although this trend introduces both pros and cons, I think that the merits do eclipse its demerits.
Admittedly, it is an undeniable truth that using technology to make meetings among the workforce can lead to several drawbacks. To begin with, it takes a long standing in order for staff to accustomed to the ways technology works. To be more specific, before a discussion, employees need to access their smart devices with the Internet and open some applications to engage in the meeting. However, these steps are challenging for someone who is not tech-savvy, particularly the elderly people, causing some staff cannot join on time. Furthermore, the purposes of managers have not totally conveyed to their employees due to the unstable connection. As a result, the outcome of these discussions cannot be fulfilled which can drive some troubles.
Nevertheless, there is a myriad of positive aspects of utilizing advanced technology in business conferences or training. First, online meetings have played a pivotal role in some emergency situations. Within a short-term time, directors are able to operate discussions with their staff regardless of time. Take Vingroup as an example, according to Vnexpress, the chairman of this enterprise was realizing the drop in stocks at night, he suddenly opened a virtual meeting to deal with this adversity and changed the situation. Moreover, with the modern items, a huge number of firms have been exchanging information with their laborers overseas. In the Co-vid 19 situations, some people working aboard cannot connect with their co-workers in person, thus an online meeting is indispensable.
To conclude, there are some downsides to making business discussions via the Internet. However, it seems to me that the benefits would overshadow due to its convenience no matter the time and location.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | nhinhi999 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | david_johnson265 | 74 | view |
- It is not realistic for people to expect to work at the same company or employer all of their life Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 Write at least 150 words 73
- The two pictures show a typical japanese office and a typical american office Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Food products labels should contain detailed information about that food To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What might be the most important information for food labels 73
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ways'' or 'way's'?
Suggestion: ways'; way's
...in order for staff to accustomed to the ways technology works. To be more specific, ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 393, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...xpress, the chairman of this enterprise was realizing the drop in stocks at night, he suddenl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, i think, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43558282209 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99759648785 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625766871166 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4111775328 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.235294118 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957336865859 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325516413926 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337340333305 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504875485406 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249610651513 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ways'' or 'way's'?
Suggestion: ways'; way's
...in order for staff to accustomed to the ways technology works. To be more specific, ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 393, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...xpress, the chairman of this enterprise was realizing the drop in stocks at night, he suddenl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, i think, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43558282209 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99759648785 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625766871166 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4111775328 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.235294118 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957336865859 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325516413926 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337340333305 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504875485406 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249610651513 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.