For the reason why it was established, educational institutions are the major reason why an economy exists because skilled and knowledgeable individuals who pass through educational institutions manage and operate in various segments that make up the economy of any country. Of course, for the success of a nation's economy, educational institutions have to contribute by releasing the best of professionals every year to be absorbed by the labor market.
However, if all fields of study are subsidiaries to major segments that hold an economy, on what grounds does one classify a career as lucrative or not? Do students choose only the lucrative fields of study to oversaturate the labor market for their chosen careers? Obviously to the detriment of other careers which suffers the less absorption of skilled people that will lead its growth and development, for example, in Nigeria, medicine, and surgery for several past decades were promoted as one of the lucrative careers which led to an average parent wanting at least one of their child to become a medical practitioner, today, the labor market for medical doctors is saturated leaving a large percentage of doctors jobless, some with jobs are being underpaid while others manage menial jobs which is not related to their field of study, this situation has caused less attraction from the younger generation to pursue a career in medicine. On the other hand, Agriculture, which was frowned at by most students, had very little entry when compared to the average number of students in a department. Today, the market for agriculture is huge and needs more professionals. Graduates are going back to take up agricultural courses from Universities and training institutions.
In addition, all the fields of study in educational institutions are meant to be evenly studied by students. If the proposer of this discussion topic focuses students' attention on a lucrative field, then who are the “unlucrative fields” meant for? The less privileged? the not-so-smart students? if none, it means “unlucrative field” should be scrapped since it doesn't guarantee a student a secure future. Sadly it cannot be scrapped, because all fields of study contribute to the growth and development of a country’s economy.
Taking attention to trends, in the 18th century, an educational institution can see political science or law as a lucrative career but presently, a career in Technology or management is seen as lucrative, that is to say, in the future, another set of careers will be termed lucrative as well. Therefore, there is actually no career more lucrative than the other.
Also, the discussion topic assumes that all students will be good at fields of study that the institution term lucrative, for instance, if the engineering field is seen as more lucrative than linguistics, a student that loves languages and not so good in engineering will fail in an engineering career while trying to follow the institution's opinion. Generally, opposing the discussion, Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose a field of study they are passionate about, till then will they be able to make the best out of their chosen career, make a sustainable living for themselves, strive to stay innovative on how emerging trends will improve their career, and finally contribute their quota to the growth and development of the country.
- Teachers salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 66
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous exper 50
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 83
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies that any 56
- women and men should carry task according to their inherent physical differences 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ountry. Of course, for the success of a nations economy, educational institutions have ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...fields” meant for? The less privileged? the not-so-smart students? if none, it mean...
^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... privileged? the not-so-smart students? if none, it means “unlucrative field” shou...
^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tive field” should be scrapped since it doesnt guarantee a student a secure future. Sa...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...ering career while trying to follow the institutions opinion. Generally, opposing the discus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, of course, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2880.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 547.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26508226691 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02564109609 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491773308958 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 915.3 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 159.182682925 60.3974514979 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 160.0 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3888888889 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.21951772744 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312638019173 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098708458791 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702518268856 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178082568677 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665943006758 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.