The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The given picture illustrates the time that the British spent on different kinds of telephone calls, namely local-fixed line, national and international-fixed line, and mobiles over 8-year period, starting from 1995.
Overall, local-fixed line calls always was the most popular type of all categories examined throughout the period. Besides, there was a substantial upward trend in national and international-fixed line dialing.
First of all, local-fixed line dialing fluctuated around 70 billion minutes that accounted for the first place during the examined span. This category experienced a moderate increase and reached the highest peak at 90 billion minutes in 1999. After that, local-fixed line calling time dropped gradually to 2002.
On the other hand, national and international-fixed line and mobile calls witnessed a steady surge between 1995 to 2002. The national and international-fixed calling grew each year and reached 61 billion in 2002 from the initial figure of 38 billion minutes. Besides, cell phones call had a significant rise by 40 billion minutes in only 7 years from about 5 billion minutes in 1995. Thank to its growth, mobiles calls showed its increasing popularity.
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Research suggests that majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem 61
- The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Which covid 19 vaccine is the most widely accepted for international travel 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5737704918 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23039108437 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0525904281 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222653983579 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987148910271 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609158337167 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130324752536 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850944268365 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5737704918 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23039108437 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0525904281 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222653983579 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987148910271 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609158337167 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130324752536 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850944268365 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.