University education should be restricted to the very best academic students, rather than being available to a large proportion of young people.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The restraint imposed on the number of students enrolled in universities is controversially discussed. Some advocate that only academically talented youngsters should have access to tertiary education, on the contrary, universities are publicly considered as a compulsory stage for a majority of teenagers. From my personal viewpoint, university education should be contemplated as a crucial period to discover a youngster’s strong suit rather than a disparity between a good academic student and an ignorant one.
To commence with, restrictions to the good-performed students to attend universities could cause waste on undiscovered talents in different fields and unfulfillment in pursuing major. Discrimination for students who have bad academic performance would not help them realize their full potential since they are not provided with chances to approach other social aspects and sectors of employment outside their textbooks. Likewise, even talented students may not find their major interested owing to the fact that their enrollments are assessed through their academic results, not by their personal inborn talent. Therefore, this measure, in all likelihood, will cultivate a workforce generation without creativity and passion for their jobs.
In terms of societal effect, this could cause a threat to the economic development of a country. Obviously, the contemporary competitive environment strongly demands people to get a higher education degree to acquire professional specialization. A degree helps people land a stable job with good pay and promotes job satisfaction. Additionally, having high and stable employment generates more GDP in a country. Without many graduates, the country faces a risk in the loss of a skilled workforce, and the loss of creativity so that the economic development of a country would slow down.
In conclusion, from my point of view, university education should be accessible by everyone. Not only does it make an individual skillful, but it also provides businesses with chances of capitalizing on rich human capital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-17 | viethung123 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-04 | mehrdadsol | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | yazhtut | 78 | view |
| 2015-05-01 | arizkis | 90 | view |
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world Why do you think it is important to do so What will the effect if children are not taught history 56
- The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 78
- The table shows the price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 78
- The government spends about 220 million pounds a year supporting museums and galleries in the UK and a similar amount subsidizing the visual and performing arts This is a huge sum to spend on minority interests and the money would be better spent on more 69
- In recent year sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy For some this is a benefit raising the profile of sports but for others it is a negative influence Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6935483871 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28180586566 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2530839748 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.071428571 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171345044666 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056543433594 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668719121826 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106307926523 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693556135977 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6935483871 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28180586566 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2530839748 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.071428571 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171345044666 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056543433594 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668719121826 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106307926523 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693556135977 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.