Some children find learning history at school very exciting, while but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children.
People have different views whether the school pupils enjoy study history subject or not. Some believe that the school children consider that this is interesting subject, however, other believe that learning about history is tedious. In my opinion, methods such as adopting technology tools and field trip can be used to increase the pupils’ interest on history.
Technological devices can be a helpful teaching tools to teach the children about history. Products of tenology such as videos or movies are able to give the school children more detailed explanation about history. Encyclopedia videos, for instance, bring a great help for the school children in comprehending a certain historical period. Not only these videos are able to provide a clear naration of historical events, but also provide visual views. Thus, the pupils can increase their undestanding as well as enjoying the pictures in the videos. As a result, history may not consider as uninteresting since it provides different learning experience.
Another way which can be used to increase school children interest in history subject is by providing school trips to historical places. The Majority of school teachers deliver information about history using textbooks or slides. This traditional teaching method will not give the youngsters a deep understanding about the topic because the children can only imagine about the condition or situation about the past event resulting in less interesting on it. However, if the schools provide field trips to the related location, the pupils will see historical objects such as artifacts and relics which give them clear view about the period of the past and enjoy the learning time.
Although there are many people think history subject uninteresting, employing technological devices and using a different teaching method can raise children’s interest on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-13 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | maitho | 71 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | Wardiati Yusuf | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | Wardiati Yusuf | 56 | view |
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 67
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that money should be spend on improving existing public transport Discuss both the 61
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this 61
- the graph below illustrates internet users as percentage of population in the countries usa canada and mexico between 1999 to 2009 67
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that money should be spend on improving existing public transport Discuss both the 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43835616438 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78512892723 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8876115661 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275333848157 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110507001322 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760855218973 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188374564899 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019040968391 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.