Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
In the modern world, diversity of nutrients has been one of the principal factors that reflect the wealth and developing pace of a nation. In fact, this has led to the terms of food importing. Notwithstanding its obvious advantages, personally speaking, I believe that the dark side of this contemporary trend is worth considering.
It is undeniable that buying food from foreign countries is demonstrated to be beneficial in some aspects of lives. There is an ubiquitous belief claiming that this trend has brought additional nutrient values to a person's meals. Apart from junk food, products, for instance, cheese, have been proven to improve social health in general. Specifically, this can reduce birth defects, which is due to the deprivation of Calcium as well as extending life expectancy.
On the contrary, drawbacks associated with this trend have occured on a massive scale. Apparently, imported food is often incompatible for low-income citizens because high expenditure is compulsorily required to afford it. To illustrate, a bar of cheese is nearly 100,000 VND, which is equal to returns of a full day of work of a construction worker. Likewise, national corporations have suffered its devastating consequences since they are outperformed by foreign companies with marvelous economic potential. Furthermore, as less tax is charged to make way for importing patterns, it puts pressure on national authorities to maintain their revenues. Eventually, domestic companies are compelled to pay in large sums, alongside being surpassed, redundancies have proliferated tremendously.
To put it simply, although the bright side of ordering foodstuffs overseas undoubtedly exists, I am wholeheartedly determined that this is a negative trend. My suggestion is that governments should take a comprehensive view to gradually balance these two contradictory aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-01 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | Mollymaul | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-07 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | RkmsU | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-02 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that technology has made the lives of workers easier while other people disagree To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- IN MANY COUNTRIES THE NUMBER OF ANIMALS AND PLANTS ARE DECLINING WHY DO YOU THINK IT IS HAPPENING HOW TO SOLVE THE ISSUE 11
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...cial in some aspects of lives. There is an ubiquitous belief claiming that this tr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, if, likewise, so, well, apart from, for instance, in fact, in general, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59154929577 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31123735166 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683098591549 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9986324427 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181215914621 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522973612256 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431223030093 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992219796576 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424477176945 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.