In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
I would disagree with the opinion that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. It is predicted that the population of the world will be increasing in the future and hence people will buy more cars to meet their needs. Additionally, cars are considered as luxury as well as the basic necessity in many parts of the world as public transport is not well developed to commute anywhere around the city.
First, the population of many countries will be increasing and therefore many people will tend to buy cars to commute easily. There is a lack of development of public transport in many parts of the world and hence people will prefer to have their car so that they are not dependent on public transport. Furthermore, it is impractical for the countries to invest heavily to build fully developed public transport in all parts of their countries. Moreover, in the future intercity travel will play an important role, which makes people lucrative to buy a car.
Secondly, cars are also considered as a status of pride in many developing countries. Additionally, the cars will not be conventional fuel-based cars but will be operating on renewable sources of energy. Currently, electric cars are becoming popular as people are getting more aware of the environmental effect due of fuel-based cars. Additionally, the living standard will be improved from the present situation, which will provide a better lifestyle to the people.
In conclusion, I believe that in twenty years, there will be more cars due to population rise in major part of the world and increase the standard of living than the present situation makes a strong argument for the people to own car. However, the design of cars will be more environment friendly taking in account carbon footprints and climate change,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- No books should ever be banned 73
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here 75
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 67
- Claim Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Reason It is inappropriate and perhaps even cruel to use public resources to fund the arts when people s basic needs are not b 50
- In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt carbon footprints and climate change,
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95751633987 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75126330697 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464052287582 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1918105129 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.692307692 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 5.45110844103 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42184453282 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172714845085 0.076458572812 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180380441198 0.0737576698707 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280932407138 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115694441371 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.