Do you think students who go to university and pay full fees should earn higher salaries than those who do not go to university?
Recently, the phenomenon of paying the full university fee and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of high salaries are highly beneficial, such an issue is regraded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that a hard-working student can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the university's fees can provide society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of responsible students, are considerable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of high incomes. Thus, beneficial ramifications of earning high salaries are visible.
From a scientific point of view, paying the university's fees can supply the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of earning low salaries are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described inefficient students. Hence, predicted outcomes of insufficient wages are crucial.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of paying the full university's fees far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of efficient students prove the significance of equitable salaries, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71681415929 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29273710287 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646017699115 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9457337876 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.454545455 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212780683248 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696723375648 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524214939663 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12087494243 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294397885858 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.