Some people think that government in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life ,while others believe that in order to achieve that government should offer free education for all.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
How to ameliorate the living standard for the people in developing areas in this world has caused a lot of discussions. Generally, the viewpoints diverged into two groups. It is believed by one group that the introduction of new technology to people in developing countries is a great improvement to the quality of their lives there. Still, there is another group saying that it is free education that could help people to achieve this goal. I tend to side with the latter viewpoint.
As a whole, people are convinced that novel technology has the potential to redefine people’s life, bringing fundamental positive changes. Therefore, it levels up the living standard. More specifically, state-of-art technological breakthroughs make lives way much convenient. It not only frees laborers from tedious routine work, but it also allows people to savor the fun bought by it anytime and anywhere. However, it is merely the first phase of what technology brings to people. If people take a close look at the life which is teemed with all types of technology, it is hard to say technology aid people or they rule people and make people somewhat slaves to them. Being a slave is torture，which has nothing to do with making a happier society. If free education is another alternative to create a happier society, it is a better choice.
To start with, education opportunities provided freely by governments give great financial relief to most households in developing countries. The truth is that most families have already realized the most direct and fastest way to improve life quality is to get a better education for family members. To meet their goals, parents would like to save every penny and invest a great proportion of their income to education for the sake of their children, the proportion as big as 70 of a whole year family income. It could be imagined that the left money is so little that it could not allow the families to allocate to any other parts, like outbound traveling, house restoration, and so on but to cover their daily expenses. A family without any escape from pressure is not a happy one. On the contrary, provided that such a huge expense was offered by the government, the living standard of a family could obviously and greatly improved.
What is more, what free education given by countries offers is their free spirit, and content for lives for their citizens in the long term while what high technology bestows is the fun and convenience temporarily. It can be predicted that more people could get cultivated by various fields of knowledge, and the opportunities are not just confined to children and teenagers. Employees who are unsatisfied with their current situation and would want to polish themselves with more skills would have a chance to go back to school without the concern of tuition fees and increasing their burden to family finance, so do the seniors who are free from work and willing to learn something that would fulfill their lives. The education chances make citizens truly have a sense of security to build and develop their career and sense of satisfaction about their lives.
In conclusion, those who desire to have more technologies in their lives, thereby building a merrier society are quite short-sighted. A better solution is to open up the opportunities of free education to people because it is going to release a family from tuition fees and fundamentally make people content with their life.
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that government in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life while others believe that in order to achieve that government should offer free education for all Discuss both th 61
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that all school students should learn a foreign language others however think that a student should not be required to learn a foreign language if he or she does not have talent for it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the contrary, to start with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 41.998997996 198% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2890.0 1615.20841683 179% => OK
No of words: 581.0 315.596192385 184% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97418244406 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.20363070211 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80991175196 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 176.041082164 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502581755594 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 912.6 506.74238477 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7242725331 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.24 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231306469708 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648631648485 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645315380468 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138964604413 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522040180478 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.