Some people think that governments in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life, while others believe that in order to achieve that governments should offer free education for all. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether new technologies should be introduced to third world's countries by administrations, or that, instead, free education should be provided to people in order to better the quality of life. I partially agree with both the opinions due to several reasons that I will discuss in greater detail in my essay.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that governments of less developed countries should introduce new technologies in their nations in order to make life easier for their people. First world people often believe so because they can directly see the changes that technology has made in their everyday life. One good illustration of this is access to the internet and computers that opened a whole world of possibilities for everyone, including early access to news and instant messaging across the world. A second point is that technology can be used in various fields, such as the governance of industries or management of public services. Thus, it goes without saying that this viewpoint is credible and important too.
On the other hand, free education is believed by some to be fundamental in the process of bettering people's lives. The main reason for believing so is that third world countries don't often have the economic possibilities to offer a free education system and only the wealthiest can afford to study. To illustrate the importance of training and education, studies have shown that education is what makes everyone on the same level, despite the wealth. Freedom of thought and expression, together with knowledge and awareness open a large number of possibilities that can better everyone's life.
After having discussed the most pertinent points of this issue, I feel that the only logical conclusion is that both points of view should be taken into consideration by governments. New technologies can help a country thrive, but an educated nation is just as important in making life-changing improvements for all.
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics. 84
- Some people think that governments in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life while others believe that in order to achieve that governments should offer free education for all Discuss both 86
- Many children these days have unhealthy lifestyle. Both schools and parent are responsible for solving this problem.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
- in some countries younger people are losing interest in teaching proffesion why is this happening what can be done to improve the situation 84
- It is difficult for people in the cities getting enough physical exercise. What are the causes and solutions? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ieving so is that third world countries dont often have the economic possibilities t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ether with knowledge and awareness open a large number of possibilities that can better everyones...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, thus, i feel, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90680502152 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586626139818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.8739453084 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.153846154 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361294192668 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113593394455 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114646356027 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204304471591 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449518811643 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.