The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
The comparison between the various four kinds of digital games sold globally throughout six years since 2000 is displayed by charts, shown in billions of dollars.
Overall, the main fact which can be observed is that global sales of games experienced an incline during the time scale, except the console, and the most popular market was marked on the handheld type.
As per data, in 2000, purchase of console games commenced at almost 6 billion dollars, while that of handed-game-player ones were greater than the previous one virtually 11 billion. Furthermore, both those contrasted until the last period, the former exceeded 12 billion, recording the biggest profit close to 18 in 2006, while the latter decreased to be around a half of the initial number.
Meanwhile, online games selling accounted for less than a billion dollars in 2001, the smallest number among others in all years reported, which it would blossom dramatically in the end of period, about a half of the maximum dollars recorded. In 2002, buying of cell phone games stood out as many as those of the counterpart, recovering gradually, then ending approximately 6.5 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | Ahihi12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | kavi jk | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 84
- The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2019 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, then, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13829787234 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75472350417 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.718085106383 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.2989507914 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.0 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285095579086 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121553020858 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555552242315 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153678045755 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436041975833 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.