Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As environmental reservation has been alarming worldwide, many claim that governments and international corporations should be responsible in taking action. However, I personally disagree with the statement. This essay will explain my point of view about why improvements must stem from minor actions in the daily lives.
At first glance, institutional support and considerable investments are the ways to generate significant changes in global scale. However, there are viable achievements can be obtained if millions of individuals practice environmental-friendly activities simultaneously.
Firstly, proper disposal of household sewage is essential to protect residential water. Since dumping garbage and sewage is mostly the cause of water contamination, each family would build a well-developed sanitation in order to assume the water table is pure and clean. Many countries, namely Japan, have elaborate systems to treat human waste meticulously, hence an unpolluted living space for citizens.
Additionally, when drivers tend to control more electronic vehicles, less fossil fuel will be exploited to serve fuel-consuming cars. Therefore, by following such trend, urban citizens would reduce particulate pollution, which is usually caused by excessive particles of liquid or solid substances brought in the atmosphere from burning fuel. Otherwise, where chargeable cars are not common, commuters can choose public transport instead of private means to cut the exhausted fumes amount.
In conclusion, although non-profit projects should be conducted by government and financially strong businesses, I believe that individual can make a considerable difference if the tiny results are stacked altogether. In fact, the potential can be limitless when people are united and pursue the mutual goal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 89
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. the provided bar chart illustrates the differences between the population of wealthy nations and developing nations during the 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'many claims'.
Suggestion: many claims
...eservation has been alarming worldwide, many claim that governments and international corp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97683397683 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33983306117 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.764478764479 0.561755894193 136% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4958220333 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.076923077 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11815687605 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370156213479 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463546170403 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619164919361 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547714281722 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.