In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Successful people in their professions must have adequate skills, experiences, and knowledge to answer all questions and solve all problems in their fields. Also, all the skills and experiences can be added or regarded as knowledge that are useful for their career. Many experts from each discipline perform well using every aspect of their knowledge as a tool to overcome difficulties, so, in this stance, knowledge play a definitive and important role for any professional worker. Without sufficient knowledge, these workers could not satisfy the goals of their fields; for example, environmental scientists who are not familiar with newly-found change on clean technology trends can not better solve the global warming issues. Thus, it is logical for anyone in their field to nurture enough knowledge to deliver the best output for their fields / employers.
Knowledge is everything that we know about. They are the facts, data, trends, anything that constitute our understanding toward a specific field of science. This variable acts as the foundation of science, and it is imperative for us to hold enough knowledge even before deciding to enter certain field that we want. People who want to be physical scientists must have enough knowledge in mathematics, physical science, and chemistry. The mathematical expressions need to be garnered to calculate every equations and to find various numbers needed to define the fact or data. Physical science is the basic knowledge that these people must acquire to understand all the basics of the field. Chemistry is needed because this subject can explain structural conditions of the atomic configurations inside any physical object that is being analyzed by the scientists. The more complex the problem, the more knowledge the scientist must understand to solve that problem. For example, you must study the newly-found quantum mechanics to solve questions for any physical component of object with less than one atomic nucleus in size. Other sciences, like humanities and social sciences, also require their experts to have enough knowledge in the fields to be successful in the job.
The knowledge is not only useful as a need for our job but also it acts as a way for us to advance in our career and to get a promotion. People in workforce can be devided into 2 types; they are generalists and specialists. The generalists should broaden their knowledge to become a manager or director of a company. The workers who come from supply chain area must learn and understand other area of fields, like finance or human resources, to aspire to become a next generation of leaders in their company. On the other hand, the specialists must deepen their knowledge. Each field of science contains infinite amount of branches, and the scientists must specify the desired branch that they want to focus on. After that, they can start to learn anything until they reach the ultimate point of obscurity within their field. These two cases prove how essential knowledge is, and imagination alone can not fulfill the basic needs for success in the professions.
Knowledge, as discussed before, might act as the main actor behind our success in career. However, imagination does have an important role in career as well, despite not being the foundation of the success. Innovation is important for solving problems or create new technology. By creating such feat, all workers who have great innovation can show that they have additional factor in their career. Nonetheless, the knowledge is still the underlying foundation of our career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 68 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | graybox | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 75
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 66
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe Jazz music is extremely popular in the city of Monroe over 100 000 people attended Monroe s annual jazz festival last summer and 50
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 932, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understand solving'.
Suggestion: understand solving
..., the more knowledge the scientist must understand to solve that problem. For example, you must stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, thus, well, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3007.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 578.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20242214533 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90322654589 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77336604267 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489619377163 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 917.1 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4356907479 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.392857143 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136066367179 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397958897529 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312879568992 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843447554111 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277426593681 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 100.480337079 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.