Each year, the crime rate increases. What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity?
There is a convincing parallel between the development of society and the increasing crime incidence. It is widely believed that violence and drug addiction are main reasons for this problem; however, with suggesting measures, it can be addressed swiftly and radically.
Admittedly, violence in the media and drug abuse which influence brains are two core reasons for the surge in the crime rate. To begin with, this occurs because violent scenes in movies are perceived as normal or even positive. Now that characters use violence as the only solution to most of the problems, which leads to the imitation by a majority of young adults. This suggests that perpetrators deliberately act like the actor and simulate action scenes in reality; therefore, the crime rate is perceptible. Further and even more importantly, the second reason is that drug abuse influences the human brain now that drug users are supposed not to be truly conscious in manners and behaviors. Alongside the addicted person may commit myriad crimes to get extra money to be able to buy more drugs. It is conspicuous that countries with less restrictions on drugs have higher crime rates.
On the subject of solutions to address/ tackle the soaring crime rate, there are two radical methods to be taken into consideration. One of these strategies is that the film censorship agencies of each country need to control and restrict vicious content. Thus, the selection of less violent content will be carried out by parents in order to monitor what children see. In the interim, restrictions against drugs are of paramount importance to control social security. The reason is that once human brains will not be affected by illicit drugs, society will be safe for all citizens. Hence, these solutions could curtail crime and cut down drug addiction.
By way of conclusion, there are two primary reasons and pragmatic solutions for the leap in the crime rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | vidung | 87 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | vidung | 92 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | linhmysuni85@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | arsh wahid | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | KEVA | 78 | view |
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone While others prefer to text messages Which type of communication do you prefer and why 66
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 82
- The chart shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roblems, which leads to the imitation by a majority of young adults. This suggest...
^^
Line 2, column 840, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun restrictions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
.... It is conspicuous that countries with less restrictions on drugs have higher crime...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08832807571 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68567480674 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577287066246 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8292084643 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.8125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229834042655 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737108875284 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451625661765 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1369257429 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233295631096 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.