Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems. What are the problems? What could be done to solve those problems?
Nowadays, it is common to see cars and bicycles travel on the same road. This may result in a number of undesirable consequences which could be addressed by several approaches explained below.
The fact that car drivers and bikers share the same roadway while travelling may lead to two main problems. First, the possibility of an accident between a car and a bicycle is much higher than when they have their own road, and in case of accidents, the mortality rate could also be greater. Because automobiles are large and able to run very fast, they may kill people when colliding with bikes, which is far more serious than accidents on the street for only bikes. Second, people driving cars would also be faced with inconveniences when they share the same road with bicyclists. For instance, instead of running as fast as possible to an appointment that they are about to be late, car drivers may have to slow down and wait for some commuter ahead riding a bike at their average speed.
In order to deal with such problems, there are two solutions that should be taken into consideration. First of all, on roadways that allow both cars and bicycles to travel at the same time, the authorities should strictly limit the maximum speed as low as 50 kph. While running at such a low speed, drivers can better control their vehicle as well as dodge others, and in the event of collision, the damage would also be less serious. Second of all, it is necessary for the government to build separate lanes for these two vehicles so that their different speeds will not bother each other as in aforementioned situations. For example, on most streets in Singapore, automobiles and bikes could travel simultaneously but there are lanes designated for both of them, so they are able to run at their speed of choice without affecting one another.
In conclusion, when cyclists and automobile drivers share the same road, a couple of issues may arise. Fortunately, two possible methods have been proposed to solve these issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-17 | lamphucviettri | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | TiaraNGuyen@99 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | immtee | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | immtee | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | immtee | 56 | view |
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 73
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples fr 84
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8242074928 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60659916858 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561959654179 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5796324972 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152827685505 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649482564058 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491436140985 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110719998277 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372667674959 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8242074928 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60659916858 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561959654179 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5796324972 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152827685505 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649482564058 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491436140985 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110719998277 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372667674959 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.