The graph below show relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph shows information about the fluctuation in the prices of three types of consumption goods including fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets, carbonated drinks and cosumer-price index over the period of 31 years.
Overall, it is clear that the prices of all mentioned goods went up over the period, with fresh fruits and vegetables price experiencing the most significant rise.
In 1997, the prices for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets, carbonated drinks and consumer-price index stood at almost the same point, approximately 70. Over a 31-year period, the price of fresh fruits and vegetables, despite some marginal drop periodically, witnessed a dramatic rise, peaking at around 340 in 2008 before falling by 10 in 2009. A similar but smoother pattern can be seen in the price for sugar and sweets, which rose gradually until reaching its peak of 200 in 2009.
Similarly, the price of carbonated drinks rose stably but at a lower pace than that of sugar and sweets, from about 70 in 1079 to just over 150 in the year 2009. Regarding consumer-price index, it also saw a considerable increase of nearly 300, reaching about 210 in the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2022-03-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | yanping | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | madina6369 | view |
- Many young people leave school with negative attitudes towards learning Why What can be done to encourage a positive attitude to learning in young people 84
- The process below shows how to make dough for a pizza Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 56
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant http testbig com sites default files styles max 650x650 public 15134677 555072 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.985 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82169718432 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.1234254328 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.428571429 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243992703697 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124538437408 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627881364514 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15983717457 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497643991204 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.