Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
The choice of one's field of study is not a trivial one. In fact, it is not uncommon for entering students to ruminate on this decision for days, perhaps months and once a decision has been made, immediately begin to second guess it. The prompt suggests that every student has to do courses which are not in their field of study along with their departmental courses. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion and argue that students should not be forced to do courses out of their field of study for two reasons.
To begin, student's interest in a field of study plays a key role in his/her future endeavors. For instance, if a student who is interested in civil engineering, forced to take courses from other departments such as computer science or electrical engineering then she wouldn't excel in these courses as she is not interested and could not spend as much time on core courses and will end up with an undermined job. The above example illustrates that if she is not forced to do other department courses then she could spend more time on his/her field of study courses and will get a job that suits for his/her talent.
Further, even if we assume all students got jobs in any field as they are doing variety of courses outside of their field of study, it will impact on the overall economy. For instance, if a student is forced to do courses from out of the field and is interested in respective field of study for suppose nuclear engineering then she could not be able to learn as much from their interested field of study as she has to spend some time on out of the filed courses. Let us assume she got a job in some nuclear engineering company and she is putting her complete efforts to improve the company's growth and thereby improving country's economy but she can do more. The above example illustrates that if she is not forced to do other department courses then he could spend more time on his/her field of study courses and comparatively she can be more effective in her company's work and which leads to more improvement in the company's growth as well as on country's economy.
Of course, some may argue that by doing courses out of the field the scope of getting a job for a students increases. I agree with this but what I am saying is universities should give freedom to opt for courses out of the field but not forcing the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The choice of ones field of study is not...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
The choice of ones field of study is not a trivial one. In...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir field of study for two reasons. To begin, students interest in a field o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ence or electrical engineering then she wouldnt excel in these courses as she is not in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a job that suits for his/her talent. Further, even if we assume all students ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owth as well as on countrys economy. Of course, some may argue that by doing ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, so, then, well, as to, for instance, in fact, of course, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52790697674 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49441236031 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409302325581 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0142605686 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.769230769 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0769230769 23.4991977007 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321520788297 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146302107116 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725114874088 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219048145001 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346526125075 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.