The given table illustrates several problems confronted by primary students in school A and B in two different year, namely 2005 and 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of children who had more difficulties in study belonged to school A. Meanwhile, some common issues related to learning were concentration in lessons, verbal expression of ideas and following instructions.
According to the conducted information, school A had a larger percentage of students who had to face with educational problems in two examined years. To be more specific, in 2005, 42% was the proportion of schoolchildren A faced with discipline problems while the figure for students in school B was only 6%. After 10 years, in terms of following instructions, the percentages of students in school A and B needed to confront were 18% and 12%, respectively.
Furthermore, children aged 6-10 years old tended to have fewer problems with literacy such as reading, handwriting, spelling and listening, whereas the opposite was true for the 3 remaining issue. Primary students in school A had relatively difficulties with basic skills, with the figures were not higher than 30%. In contrast, the figure for soft skills was relatively high, even reaching a peak at 42% in following disciplines issue.
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 78
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 61
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 67
- In many countries recently young people have been living far from their parents from the time they began studies or work until they married Do you think there are more advantages or disadvantages of this trend 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2270531401 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11679200481 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2217125329 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22535541376 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978905423682 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981461322912 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159759841774 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111483303041 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.