The picture below depicts several changes that took place in a particular university campus since 1985.
Overall, the layout of the campus has experienced numerous modifications to become more environmentally-friendly and modern over a period of more than 35 years.
To begin with, in 1985, the university campus was designed into distinct sectors which is located along both side of the central road. Firstly, the old library situated on the north-west corner of the map are now expanded nearly twice as much as the old square. In addition, the previous library is also associated with IT center to cater for the need of the students. Secondly, instead of 3 independent blocks, including physics, chemistry and Biology aspects, was on the right-hand side of the library, nowadays, they are merged to create new apartment called science laboratory. Meanwhile, in the same regions of science zone, the appearance of lecture theater can create separate space for the purpose of lecturing.
Furthermore, the car park, which used to be opposite to the library, existed in 1985 is then replaced by a bus terminal. It can also be seen that different sectors in the university campus are now connected with each others by long footpaths and a plenty of green trees are planted along the pedestrian roads to make this place more airy. In contrast, the admin building still remained intact regardless of size and location from 1985 to today.
- Zoos are inhumane and should be abolished To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 62
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 67
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, in addition, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09322033898 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91341832218 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635593220339 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8296372065 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.2 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134705033971 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515590953244 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861087885461 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10718858739 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102944553197 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.