Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is it the case? What can be done to attract local people to visit these places?
Nowadays, tourism has become a more debatable topic among people. Many local museums and historical sites are visited by mostly foreigns than local ones. In this essay, I will argue why this happens and gives possible solutions for attracting more local residents to these sites.
To embarks with, the biggest reason for having fewer native citizens in historical places and museums is the fee. In fact, when the ticket price of these sites is higher, many middle-class people cannot afford it. It will lead them to avoid visiting this museum or a site. In addition, local people have clearly ideas about all events, which took place in sites, so they are less likely to spend their money to watch the same things. This has resulted in a decrement in their visiting rate. In Gujarat, the fee of the Sabarmati riverfront is very higher, which attracts only foreign tourists. Therefore, the more the historical places and art exhibits charge money in their tickets, the fewer people like to visit who live in that area.
Moreover, solving these obstacles have several ways. If organizers of ancient sites and museums reduce the rate of prices, many local visitors afford it in their budgets. Furthermore, if they try to exhibit new arts and things for certain periods, which increase interest in people. These two ways will lead native ones to visit that particular area more. Since the art museum of China started to more exhibitions on monthly basis with fifty per cent discounts and memberships, the ratio of national visitors increased drastically. Hence, the more new arts and things in museums, the more they will attract participants.
In conclusion, having huge fees in historical areas and museums, which decreases the proportion of local visitors and their interests. However, when these places start to exhibit new arts and things with lower fees, it will attract not only more natives but also foreigners as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-01 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need a dumb worker more do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 46
- Some poeple think that in this modern world getting old is entirely sad However others people believe that old poeple is much better now than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Given high unemployment rate it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education What do you think 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a di erence To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.065830721 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43076312887 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573667711599 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0413428587 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304151740716 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100001454033 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859845704725 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20051675992 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845666494473 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.