The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purpose in six areas of the world.
The comparison in water usage for three various purposes in six world regions is displayed by the pie chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, the water drained for agricultural purpose is the highest in the developing areas. However, the developed ones show an exception for that.
As per data, there is a very large majority of water used for farming in Asia and Africa with more than four-fifths, compared to that for household and industry there at below one in five. Furthermore, South America makes up over seven in ten of water for agriculture, being by far from two other sectors with under a fifth.
This contrasted to the advanced continents, the industrial use takes up the proportion of water at the most, approximately a half. Additionally, Europe utilizes around a third of the water, which is lower than it in North America at almost two-fifths. Meanwhile, the rate of that in domestic utilization in those places accounts for less than a fifth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-25 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-17 | totaj1997 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | Vishal Gangore | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | Ariuntungalag | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | Ariuntungalag | 67 | view |
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In some companies a typical working week has been reduced to 30 hours Do the advantages outweigh the demerits 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94444444444 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8428120852 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2558184986 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305741197712 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123170736696 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790054073919 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184771654322 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710925033514 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.