Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It has raised public concern over the past decades that some people decide to have a gap year in lieu of attending university immediately. Despite the fact that there are various demerits, I personally believe that they could be outweighed by the merits.
On the one hand, there are numerous perks when it comes to a gap year. The most apparent advantage of this trend is that students who take a gap year have more opportunities to enhance their knowledge about the realities of the world. This means that such individuals can apply and experience jobs about which they dream. Not only does this help gain more experience in the real world but it also avoids going the wrong path in their future career. Taking England as an example, the governments should suggest students to take a gap year to enjoy their youth and experience their passions. This can lead to the reduction of psychological issues among teenagers.
On the other hand, learning university directly could be fraught by a plethora of pitfalls. Firstly, while some friends are free after 12 years in school, they still continue to study directly at university. Students can be more boring when having to learn university immediately. This can prompt the growth of student’s absence and it is not obviously good for the school's reputation. Secondly, individuals can lose their attention on their academic route by some distractions such as jobs, wages and the experience which they can not gain in their school. It is easier for such students to take an absent period of time to explore and opt for which is more important between learning and working.
In conclusion, it seems to me that this will be a positive trend so that the governments and parents support their children to take a gap year for themselves to get the right answer for their future career.
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurch two cities in New Zealand and London and Edinburgh two cities in the United Kingdom Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 69
- Some people think an aging population can cause big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and for society in general 73
- The charts below give the information about levels of education in Glasgow a city of Scotland in 2010 21
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...ce and it is not obviously good for the schools reputation. Secondly, individuals can l...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 608, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ier for such students to take an absent period of time to explore and opt for which is more im...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87539936102 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63184331418 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536741214058 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.684478656 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.733333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136307386048 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474171563061 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389371621718 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816133718091 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584654138355 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...ce and it is not obviously good for the schools reputation. Secondly, individuals can l...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 608, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ier for such students to take an absent period of time to explore and opt for which is more im...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87539936102 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63184331418 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536741214058 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.684478656 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.733333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136307386048 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474171563061 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389371621718 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816133718091 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584654138355 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.