Nowadays, we are living in a throw-away society. What are its causes and what are its problems?
It has raised the public concern over the past decades that we are living in a society which everything is thrown away. There are some driving forces why this is the case and some pitfalls are proposed to appear in the future.
On the one hand, a throw-away society is caused by some reasons which should be taken into consideration. The main explanation of the case is that an ever-increasing number of people use one-time plastic items, which leads to millions of tonnes of plastic waste into the environment every day. Due to the fact that such items are convenient and necessary for people to take away so the usage of plastic things, especially plastic bags, is significantly increasing day by day. Taking Vietnam as an example, most people use single-used items as their habit. This leads to the polluted environment and the throw-away society.
On the other hand, there are numerous dire consequences which seem to be dangerous to people. Firstly, if people continue to litter single-used items into their living areas, the environment will be polluted. Even now, many people are calling for greater state intervention to save the environment. Secondly, the amount of waste is growing day by day because items which are made of plastic are tough to decompose. Even some items take one thousand years in the world to disappear. Therefore, if individuals do not raise their awareness about their action, they can contribute to the detrimental environment, even they could live with their waste in the future.
In conclusion, there are various driving engines to cause a throw-away society, which is related to the single-used items. If humans do not tackle this immediately, this case can degrade the quality of the environment and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-18 | hnhung | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | ajendrapatel | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Anoopben | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Muhammed_10 | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-28 | dhruvp12 | 78 | view |
- The first chart below shows the value of goods that Australia imported from China and those exported to China from Australia The second chart shows the types of goods imported from China Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main featur 84
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below gives the information about spending on different advertisement methods of four car companies in UK in 2008 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- In some educational systems children are required to study one or more foreign languages In others foreign language study is not a requirement What are the potential benefits of foreign language study Do you think foreign language study is an important pa 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It has raised the public concern over th...
^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are proposed to appear in the future. On the one hand, a throw-away society is...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, even so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05862068966 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79822646397 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527586206897 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6683775423 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102144160293 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417451562979 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590007609643 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735996776689 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314816554517 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.