Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The popularity of accommodations is always stimulated by advertisements, thus I do agree that the true feelings for consumption are neglected by society in recent days.
Firstly, the beauty on the screen may lead to an un-controlled association with the fantasy 'pretty look' of the clothes showing on ourselves. We are all misled by the woman who is nowhere the same build as us. Moreover, even her smooth curly hair makes us can't wait for buying the conditioner, even we have already stored many without scraped. Secondly, the advertising price sometimes motivates us to click the links on shopping websites unconsciously. However, only when the products have been expressed right on our desks can we remember the impulsive buying actions. Considering that, it seems this is not the real thing we actually hope for at present. Finally, the news has warned people for times that the advertisements often boost the effect of medicine just to pursuit a better sale. For example, I bought a nutrient fluid for the scalp which is called to have a surprisingly positive influence to instantly raise the speed of hair. But when I check the ingredients, the only active composition is ginger with a low rank on the list. In that case, it is the advertisement everywhere that can't be canceled before TV shows or deliberately added by software that cause the high sales rather than the necessity.
In conclusion, I do believe the prosperity of consumption can't get rid of the magic of marketing rather than what society wants indeed.
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 61
- Many scientists believe that now we can study the behavior of a three year old child to see whether they will grow up to be criminals To what extent do you think the human nature produces crimes And how can we prevent children from growing up to be crimin 67
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 56
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re neglected by society in recent days. Firstly, the beauty on the screen may le...
^^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...er, even her smooth curly hair makes us cant wait for buying the conditioner, even w...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1099, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...it is the advertisement everywhere that cant be canceled before TV shows or delibera...
^^^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o believe the prosperity of consumption cant get rid of the magic of marketing rathe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, however, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9609375 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9495990028 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66796875 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2898039317 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12868620522 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411609937979 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378884904055 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924350299023 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221498759816 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.