Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Advertising is one of the most powerful methods that consumers can attract to buy goods and product which is not necessary for them. I strongly agree with this idea.
Investments and companies use different ways to sell their goods and products. Advertising is one of these ways that can help to attract more consumers. To begin with when people see many different advertisings in different places, it can affect them to buy unnecessary goods. It particularly happens for women who witnesses different ads about kitchen’s tools; although those products or kitchen's utensils seem useless, they are tempted to have them in their houses as the token of wealth or social prestige.
Another point is the content of ads. Because it is the simple way to inform potential customers of the company's products and the features they may have; so some ads are produced either by an especial famous actor or actress or especial music or theme to present them to societies. In other words producing tempting ads needs an innovative mind to makes effective ads that make people buy unnecessary things. There are many ads that are useless but by a good subject manufactures can sell their goods. It is art that every investment should know. As a result, Advertising have effects on people who do not need to buy any unnecessary things.
Finally, it is very important to use ads appropriately. Although many companies use different sport teams to show their goods as ads, they do not have any relation to these teams such as Coca-Cola Company. So that people should be aware not to buy unnecessary things because of their stars.
In conclusion, I think that Advertising is a powerful tool that investments and companies should use to sell more of their goods.
- the diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...onsumers. To begin with when people see many different advertisings in different places, it ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 466, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'manufacture'?
Suggestion: manufacture
... that are useless but by a good subject manufactures can sell their goods. It is art that ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, so, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93898305085 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72399827804 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528813559322 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3971232759 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0625 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117803416181 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417493928137 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430449665201 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818993207254 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462363534508 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...onsumers. To begin with when people see many different advertisings in different places, it ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 466, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'manufacture'?
Suggestion: manufacture
... that are useless but by a good subject manufactures can sell their goods. It is art that ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, so, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93898305085 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72399827804 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528813559322 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3971232759 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0625 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117803416181 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417493928137 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430449665201 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818993207254 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462363534508 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.