The presented table elucidates the results of research undertaken in Scotland with 6800 adults aged from 16 to 74 to assess their involvement in a variety of cultural activities over a 12-month period.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that participation in any performance and crafts were the most popular for all age groups while computer-based was the least well-known cultural activities for all age groups except 25-44.
The highest participation in any activities was seen in the 16-24 age group, with 35% and 30% respectively doing performance and visual arts. In contrast, other activities were much lower, particularly those computer-based, at only 10%. The highest attendance rate seen for 24-44 years old was in performance, at 22%. A similar rate of 22% was evident for the most ubiquitous activity for the 45-74 age group, which was crafts. The popularity of computers was very low for all those who were 25+, as interested in writing.
Taking all age groups together, it is clear that performance and crafts were the most common, at over 19%, whereas cultural purchases and visual arts were slightly less popular at 16% and 15% accordingly. Eventually, little interest was shown in writing and computing.
- Q17 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Crime is a big problem in the world many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion 95
- The graph below shows cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain 84
- The maps below show Pancha Village in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The map gives information about a university sports court 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, look, well, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25373134328 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99932749902 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592039800995 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5800192062 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159331194923 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703622866848 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860422619152 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126798525437 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999536536141 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.