In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.
It is widely believed that in the future, all vehicles will follow automated driving, which means only passengers will travel into these means of transports. Although this development would lead to some drawbacks, in this essay, I will explain why the benefits outweigh them.
To begin with, the proponents of this technology are excited by the supposed advantages of traveling in a driverless vehicle. The first one is that automation always works orderly and scientifically. Consequently, these types of machinery rarely put passengers in trouble by getting behindhand in moving around or even getting lost. Another issue is that humans’ safety will be assured by driver-free transports. In fact, this concept can be illustrated by the example of China, a country that was successfully applied unmanned conveyances in reality. The figures showed an impressive result that accidents have reduced approximately 48% since driverless cars became commonplace.
Besides, passengers and drivers will benefit enormously from automated transports. Travelers can enjoy a comfortable atmosphere inside cars without being disturbed by the driver. There’s also no need for passengers to face forwards to be vigilant over the dangers or problems. In addition, thousands of people perish year-round in traffic accidents due to neglectful chauffeurs. With the fast-paced development of self-driving transportation, entertainment technology, such as video screens, could be used without any concern of distracting the driver, thus can prevent accidents.
In conclusion, although some worry about the consistency of self-driving vehicles, I believe decreased spending on traffic facilities and increased road safety fully justify this innovation. Governments and corporations should therefore invest more in this promising technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The table compares the production of carbon dioxide in five countries in 2017 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 85
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show the Expenditure on Health Education UAE as percentages of GDP and Infant mortality and life expectancy Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 67
- The pie charts below present information about what the UK graduates did after leaving university in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lain why the benefits outweigh them. To begin with, the proponents of this te...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... driverless cars became commonplace. Besides, passengers and drivers will ben...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elopment of self-driving transportation, entertainment technology, such as video ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... driver, thus can prevent accidents. In conclusion, although some worry about...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91320754717 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21574977817 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68679245283 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6223337926 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.466666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274642787831 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755623964515 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662362740023 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141592979028 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860280598692 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.7 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.