Some people hold the view that information should solely disseminate among various experts, while others say that everyone has access to precious information. I agree with the former group because there is more technology in new fields and more pace in technology development in this way.
All the experts need information in various spectrum of disciplines. Several companies collaborate and share their achievements. In these cases, they leverage their competitive advantages to build a new product that could tackle a vexing issue. For instance, Facebook plans on collaborating with Meta to establish a cutting-edge platform providing new technology to users. Undoubtedly, without this sharing of information, it will not be possible.
Furthermore, sharing of information boosts the pace of technology development. In this way, they are not only collaborating but also competing with others too. Therefore, this sharing plays a crucial role to compete with rivals and increase the pace of technology development.
It is argued that crucial information should be free and accessible for everyone. A large number of discoveries are funded by companies and private investors who hope either to make money or consolidate their position in the market. So if the information spread freely, they will not invest in science base projects anymore, and finally, there is no chance to have new scientific achievements. In addition, the scientific world is so competitive. Certainly, many discoveries are about this competition during history. It is a necessary attribute to continue science developments so sharing of information in this field does not make sense. For example, at the end of the 20th century, the USA and the Soviet Union had an exert competition in the space industry, which those vigorous attempts excrete hurdles in this industry and bring about discoveries.
In conclusion, information sharing creates competition which brings us many achievements in different fields, while sharing new technology freely has detrimental repercussions.
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 56
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...ld be free and accessible for everyone. A large number of discoveries are funded by companies and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 718, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ntury, the USA and the Soviet Union had an exert competition in the space industry, whic...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58012820513 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16889617093 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592948717949 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3898623172 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7222222222 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189435195837 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627098598442 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518894717474 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109743831258 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214977257319 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.