The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 to 2030
The given line graph illustrates how many commuters traveling per day by car, bus and train from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the number of the UK commuters who used car and train to travel each day, but a downward trend in that of bus. In addition, the data of car was always the highest.
By 1970, the figures for car started on the top at around 5 millions, higher than that of bus and train, accounting for 1 million and 2 millions respectively. Additionally, the data of three transports remained unchanged in next decade. Between 1980 and 2000, the number of commuters in the UK traveling per day by car increased remarkably to 7 million, followed by a slight growth the level of train from 2 to 3 milions, while that of bus dropped to 3.5 millions, nearly 5 hundreds.
Whereas the amount of car and bus remained unchanged from 2000 to 2010, the data of bus experienced a decline to over 3 millions. In the last year, the average number of people traveling by car was expected to reach the top at 9 millions, bus will bottom at 3 million much lower than that of car at 5 millions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-20 | ngoc.tuyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | ngoc.tuyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | ngoc.tuyen | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030 73
- Internet users as percentage of population 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 62
- the graph below show the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'traveling', 'travelling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: traveling; travelling
...the UK commuters who used car and train to travel each day, but a downward trend in that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41747572816 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60550762754 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9078202007 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425656132433 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181479182627 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133060229935 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281735838135 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806247939588 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.