To succeed in a business, one needs to know maths. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this contemporary era, start-up businesses are spreading like wildfires. With regards to this phenomenon, people tend to conceive of successful entrepreneurs as being masters at maths. On the other hand, others contend that maths is not a necessary ability to succeed. This essay will throw some light on both notions and give a personal conclusion.
To commence with, there are some rationales for those who reckon being good at mathematics as an initial quality for businessmen. It is clear that the vast majority of commercial trading is directly linked to the economy. Hence, a business father might need to absorb maths knowledge, in consistent with economic elements. This will help him grasp the market operation, actually calculate and analyse data such as revenue; eventually forecast the trends, and plan a promising strategy to gain competitive advantages. Generally, it is math that fosters a merchant's logical thinking which is a fundamental background of a high achiever in the business sector.
In stark contrast, we should not lose sight of other disciplines' benefits. As long as a businessman involves in a market, he will realise that there are more important competencies than mathematics one. In fact, many case studies have proven that other interpersonal abilities such as communication and leadership skills, networking, bright vision, persistence, and ambition contribute a huge part to a successful business. Even if a manager is not good at math at all, he or she could have a strong network with those who master in this domain and are willing to support or give him or her hand. For instance, many peasants become well-known businessmen in trading and exporting vegetables even though they do not have many maths skills. However, they must be an adept in farming and agriculture and leave mathematical issues to another professional.
By and large, I side with those who advocate that maths does not solely contribute to business success. The organizational manager needs to have a wide range of qualities in order to bring their products or services to dominate in the shared market as well as conquer desperate situations. In my personal perspective, an ideal business is a question of its founder's personality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-25 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over of three countries in 1980 and 2000 and prediction in 2030 67
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 56
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and the present day 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a merchant' or simply 'merchants'?
Suggestion: a merchant; merchants
...ges. Generally, it is math that fosters a merchants logical thinking which is a fundamental...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, so, well, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22651933702 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02588468795 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.694290826 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19100808624 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555938526635 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468125324203 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11864821975 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288223352428 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.