Should marketing in companies which produce consumer goods like food and clothing, place emphasis on reputation of the company or short-term strategies like discount and special offers? Why?
Recently, the phenomenon of marketing consumer goods in companies and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of emphasing on reputation is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and beneficial by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that short-term strategies can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essey.
From a social standpoint, marketing businessess related to food and clothing could provide society with some noticeable effects which are roted in the fact that the merits of focusing on reputation as well as short-term plans are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered discounts. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both special offers and companies' strategies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, marketing in companies might increase the consequences of producing consumer products. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the importance of reputation could relate to this reality that the demerits of specific offers pertain to short-term strategies. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of emphasing on marketing in companies is correlated negatively with consumer products. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this attitude.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of marketing for reputation in companies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the consumer productions prove the significance of the strategy of special offers, but also pinpoint good remarkable implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-06 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2024-02-06 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
- Imagine you have been assigned on the study of the climate change Which area of climate change will you choose and why Use examples 78
- Should there be a maximum wage for highly paid people Is it good or bad 76
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can gain knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this Explain it with your own experience 85
- The means of communicating in society today has changed greatly over the last ten years Give your opinion 85
- Schools should prepare students for university rather than for work To what extent do you agree with this statement 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81060606061 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28535547636 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4206508451 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33294500219 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103312723505 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568207425791 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185421343 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275181217305 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.