There are both advantages and disadvantages of company workers assessing their own products and services Discuss

Essay topics:

There are both advantages and disadvantages of company workers assessing their own products and services. Discuss.

Recently, the phenomenon of large companies and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the worldwide businesses is highly beneficial, such issue is regarding thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that leaders can be a plus and I will analyze that thoroughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, assesing products and services can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the percise assessmnet as well as being useful are inextricablty bound up. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more happy customers. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both boses and high quality services apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, the domestic checking might increase the consequences of the loyalty. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of new products could relate to this reality that the demerits of the assessing products pertain to different services. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of the quality check is correlated negatively with the less income. Hence, it is correct to persume the preconceived notion of the attitude.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the correct assessment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of earning more money prove the significance of being carefull, but also pinpoint the future implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54724409449 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12182878961 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657480314961 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0852506984 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165870538322 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454050048996 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400114048786 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815976008813 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237224908023 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.