Animal habitats have been destroyed, and some animal species (e.g the tiger and the rhino) have become endangered.
Why does this happen?
What can be done to protect endangered animals?
In contemporary society, the living environment of animals has been lost, and some faneuil species stand on the brink of extinction. The following paper will be looking at the reasons for this situation and suggest possible solutions for the problems.
There are several factors associated with the destruction of animal habitats and the reasons why they are threatened. The first reason is deforestation because the need for accommodations has been increasing. As a result, numerous forest areas have been cut down to give space for the construction of facilities. As a result, animals have no place to live so they will be captured and sent to the zoo or killed. Moreover, animals might be hunted for body parts. This is mainly due to the growth of the fashion industry, many people desire to own unique clothing items which are made from animal's body such as skin or fur. Hence, their survival will be pushed to the edge of extinction and these species will gradually vanish.
Several solutions can be taken into account to alleviate the problems. First, setting up new animal conservations is one simple approach. Governments need to invest in the construction of specific areas that are able to provide natural habitats and drive threats, such as poachers or predators, away. Therefore, the number of species can be somehow recovered through time. Additionally, another solution is that the government needs to impose stricter punishments. By putting poachers in jail as well as giving higher financial punishments, hunters may have a second thought before committing wrongdoings. As a result, it can be predicted that this method can decrease the animal death rate by hunters.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that animal habitats and species have been at risk due to deforestation and hunting. However, setting up animal conservations and imposing stricter punishments can help mitigate the consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-03 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illnesses rather than funding the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 90
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of popultion in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32258064516 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97307375183 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8658453327 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333066562598 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994554478514 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645646930465 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207800092829 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411886145947 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.