Tpo-54 integrated
The reading and the lecture are both about the practical ways of reducing water salinity in the Salton sea, to preserve animal lives there. Whereas the author suggests three ways to reduce the salinity of the lake, the lecturer states that these ideas are unrealistic and not practical. She refutes each of the reasons.
First, according to the reading by using desalination facilities near the lake, they can heat the water and then condense the vapor to make freshwater then, return it to the lake. However, the lecturer disputes this idea. She mentions that these facilities can reduce the salinity level, but as mentioned in the passage there will remain some solid waste materials that can be harmful to human health. The desalination process produces some chemicals except salt which are toxic. For example, Selenium can be spread through the air and make serious health problems for locals by breathing.
Second, the author claims that they can transfer water by pipelines or canals from the Pacific ocean, which is 20% less salty, to the lake and dilute it. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this statement. She believes that constructing such a long pipeline or canal about one hundred kilometers will cost a lot of money. So, this project is very expensive to be practical.
Finally, the reading suggests that by dividing the lake into smaller sections by walls, then delivering all receiving freshwater from rainfall or rivers to the main section, they can save it. On the contrary, the lecturer rejects this point by saying that these walls can't stand long term since this area experiences very intensive geographical phenomena like earthquakes. As a result, the constructed walls with the first earthquake will be destroyed and the water banks will mix again. She believes that this is just a short-term solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-02 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-18 | parsaramezan | 83 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | Ali Talaei | 86 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Percival Wong | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | Tequila | 75 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- Do you agree or disagree with this opinion Advertising influences people s behavior in a negative way 76
- tpo 55 integrated 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s this point by saying that these walls cant stand long term since this area experie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, whereas, for example, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11333333333 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57147601367 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.198564326 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324522609747 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874631148453 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775755108979 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19247713405 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029304698147 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.