Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money. What are the reasons and solutions of this issue?
High school students are studying up on literature, chemistry and world history; however, most aren’t learning fundamental money lessons to help them financially navigate the real world. Parents’ lack of financial knowledge and negligence of the education bureaucracy towards the matter are the biggest culprits; thus, several measures need to be taken to tackle those heightened concerns.
On the one hand, regardless of the fact that an overwhelming majority of teens desire more financial education, neither parents nor educational institutions are paying proper attention to financial literacy. It is said that a number of high schools are doing the bare minimum to equip students with the required skills for money management. In other words, state governments are focused on teaching the core subjects of Maths and English that personal finance often gets overlooked. In addition, parents today are not confident in their abilities to teach their kids about money management. Sadly enough, many parents haven’t learned critical financial values themselves; hence, they may be passing bad financial habits to their kids.
In essence, most teenagers lack personal money management skill as no one around them talks about it. Therefore, it is vital for parents to use financial hardships and strained budgets as an opportunity to talk about finances and teach kids about managing money around the dinner table. Teenage kids should also be included in budget planning through a weekly or monthly allowance. Another feasible approach is the embedding of financial literacy course into the school curriculum. Amongst traditional core subjects, students should be required to complete personal-finance classes to graduate.
In conclusion, lack of financial knowledge could leave serious implications on a kid’s livelihood. This is calling for collective actions of parents and schools to bring moneyrelated education into everyday conversations as well as the official curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-04 | Trần Thị Ngọc Mai | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | vuhieuquy | 59 | view |
| 2020-11-27 | minhtrile010@gmail.com | 71 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | klaralinh864 | 78 | view |
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 84
- Some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70134228188 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92912272203 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634228187919 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6289550914 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.357142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16201229026 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558589930615 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496537935251 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097181630243 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01724922383 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70134228188 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92912272203 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634228187919 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6289550914 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.357142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16201229026 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558589930615 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496537935251 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097181630243 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01724922383 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.