Not all family members are having meals together in everyday bases. Why? Positive or negative?
Globally, an increasing number of people are no longer eating with their family for every meal. In my point of view, the primary reason for this phenomenon is the busy lifestyle that people have, and it is totally a detrimental trend.
People have no choice but to have meals separately with their children or parents as they have a hectic life. In a modern society where there are various roles in a family, including students and full-time employees, households have to lead a different routine over a day. It is inconvenient and unrealistic for relatives who have day and night shifts to have food side by side every day, since some of them may need to make a huge compromise by sacrificing their resting time. Thus, family members prefer to feed themselves alone or with their colleagues.
Some people may think it is a positive development because they can decide when and what to have when it comes to meals without considering relatives’ preferences. However, people in a family will become alienated from each other as they will lose valuable time and opportunities for communication. Considering the fast-paced lifestyle mentioned above, mealtime has been the only hours that some people have to interact with kin during the day, talking about things happening and expressing care and love. Having meals without their children or parents means depriving the chance to boost the bond among the family.
Moreover, it is negative for the health of the younger generation if guardians are unable to eat with them. Without proper supervision from eating on the same table, children are partial to having fast food which is delicious but unhealthy without the nutrients needed for their growth. Young people may eat instant food since they are busy with study and work, having no time to cook for themselves. Thus, it is possible that the next generations have no well-rounded nutrition intakes and may become mal-nutritious when they are not able to have meals with senior family members on a daily basis.
In conclusion, I think that the stressful studying and work life is the key reason why some families do not have meals together daily, and I believe this is absolutely bad for people in terms of relationships and health, despite its convenience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-26 | mardanpour | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
- TPO 52 3
- It is a waste of money for the government to spend money on space travel or space exploration. 76
- In some culture children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- in some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 61
- Which do you prefer to buy new technological devices immediately after they become available or to wait till many people have adopted accepted and started to use them 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd it is totally a detrimental trend. People have no choice but to have meals ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01058201058 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71121173541 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550264550265 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3436608452 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.266666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223107240307 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081454860452 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506204842106 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133542692085 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284390781299 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.