The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006.
The bar chart depicts the worldwide citizens’ expenditures on various categories of video games over 7 years between 2000 and 2006.
Overall, handheld games stayed the most popular, outnumbering the other three by 2 to 5 times over the period. Interestingly, the market had also been diversified by 2006 with mobile phone and online games joining the race, along with the existing console and handheld games.
In terms of handheld games, its revenue gradually increased by one-third over time, from just under 12 billion dollars to roughly 18 billion dollars. On the other hand, console games experienced an inverse trend with a steady decrease over 7 years, hitting its low of 3 billion dollars in 2006.
Regarding the new kinds of games entering the market, online games were the first to join in 2001, followed by mobile phone games appearing a year later. Although most of the time their figures were either equal or the mobile phone’s were higher, online games’ sales accelerated in the final year and exceeded that of mobile phones, making up approximately 9 and 7 billion dollars respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | hoangminh2409 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | ninjam18118 | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 73
- The two maps below show the road access to the hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13186813187 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66768285593 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0081100934 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173709602484 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083291561692 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493183058875 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108548128503 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435246021205 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.