The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line graph depicts the amount of questions people asked the Tourist Information Office in 2011 and categorized the result by the channels in which they arrived.
Overall, all channels reported an increase, except a fall in mailing. Furthermore, in the first three months, there were not any big differences until March. From that point, considerable changes started to happen, with the channel of asking in-person showing the most significant growth over time.
In terms of inquiries asked in person, the figure began the period at the lowest point of the three at just over 400 and had doubled by March, after which it escalated, reaching its peak at roughly 1900. Similarly, although fluctuating at first, phoning also peaked at the end of the period with approximately 1600.
On the other hand, despite being a close second at the start, it was not until March that letter sending and mailing started to decrease, especially steep between March and May, hitting its low and leveling off at just below 400 in the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-04 | brew | 65 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | euphorianmt | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | leuleu28 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the population figures for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012 78
- The two maps below show the road access to the hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 89
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, second, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00581395349 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53613021412 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68023255814 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4093784559 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111306937669 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497239280373 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579139761723 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737262060566 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625478717198 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.