Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
History is evident that time and time again, the world has been blessed with several prodigies who went on to lay global impact in their corresponding fields. Identifying and nurturing such rare talents is a task in itself and some reckon that society should make training available to such children at an early age. I agree with the suggested approach but only partially, since I believe that the case has more to it than what meets the eye.
When specially talented and gifted children take birth, they unfortunately do not come with birth marks that would indicate their talent. Therefore, it becomes the primary task of the parents, teachers and the society as a whole to identify such children and give them the proper environment so that they can sharpen their skills. Such programs promise to do justice to the special children and it will also be time saving, because the sooner these kids develop, the sooner can they show their identity to the world. It can be particularly crucial in performance sports, as these fields can have a retirement age as young as late thirties or early forties. European Football can be taken as a very effective instance here. Reputed clubs worldwide recruit scouts to locate naturally talented kids and they offer academy admissions to kids as young as only 3 years old. This makes it possible for such children to grow and feature in the senior team in their teens. Legends like Messi and Ronaldo have had a similar childhood and we all know how good they are.
However, when such classified attention is given to some, the social pressure racks up on their young shoulders. Parents and elders start expecting highly and the pressure to perform can potentially take a mental toll on such children. Messi and Ronaldo may be good examples but it is difficult to believe that they would not have had stiff competitors when they were young. But do we know many of such rivals they had? Not really, and that is because those rivals probably crumbled under the rising societal ambitions unfortunately and their talent stayed dormant and malnutritioned somewhere within them. Therefore, even when the mentioned program sounds fair and reasonable, the program should be carefully paced to accommodate the selected candidates. Such a program should not be too hardcore initially and ideally, it should be adaptive, because similarly talented children can very possibly grow to be very differently talented adults. Such programs should also involve psychiatrists and medical personnel to properly observe their behavioural traits and decisions should be taken accordingly.
The major drawback of the mentioned action is the possible seclusion of the talented children from the societies. Childhood is a phase of life that everyone should be able to fondly look back at. When we initiate rigorous training regime on prodigies, we are essentially taking away the days from them, which they are supposed to look back at and expect a smile on their face, when they grow up. Moreover, by giving them special attention, we might end up making other children and their parents feel inferior, which by no means, is a commensurate scenario. World has had plenty individuals who were clueless in their childhood and treated as failures or outcasts in their childhood, but eventually went on to do well in their respective careers. Adrian Newey, a motorsport engineer, who worked most of his adult life at Red Bull Racing Team, competing in Formula 1, was seen as a dull and unpromising candidate by his school teachers, but he went on to be recognised as one of the most innovative design engineers in his field. Had he been excluded from some sort of special program in his childhood and got demotivated, who knows if he would have gone on to achieve the greatness as he did?
To conclude, I believe the aforementioned idea of giving special attention to special children is definitely bright, but such campaigns must be executed with plans of dynamic nature and it also should not inspire negligence towards other children, because every child is special in their own way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-18 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2024-02-13 | Tammy__kk | 79 | view |
| 2024-01-10 | luljaime | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one t 78
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 70
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1139, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had gone'?
Suggestion: had gone
...od and got demotivated, who knows if he would have gone on to achieve the greatness as he did? ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, similarly, so, therefore, well, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 35.0 14.8657303371 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3423.0 2235.4752809 153% => OK
No of words: 686.0 442.535393258 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98979591837 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11777311996 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66119639872 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 354.0 215.323595506 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516034985423 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 1056.6 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2517868049 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4074074074 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245393041506 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660576943914 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504276314078 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147962718519 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347904013887 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 100.480337079 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1139, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had gone'?
Suggestion: had gone
...od and got demotivated, who knows if he would have gone on to achieve the greatness as he did? ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, similarly, so, therefore, well, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 35.0 14.8657303371 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3423.0 2235.4752809 153% => OK
No of words: 686.0 442.535393258 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98979591837 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11777311996 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66119639872 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 354.0 215.323595506 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516034985423 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 1056.6 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2517868049 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4074074074 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245393041506 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660576943914 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504276314078 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147962718519 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347904013887 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 100.480337079 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.