4-days work week
Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether the 4 days work week will beneficial to the company as well as the employee as a whole. The former argues that this will have a great impact on the company and individual by three specific ways but the latter counters each of the points made by the reading.
First of all, the reading contends that, reduced workweek would increase the benefit of the company as they have to pay only the 80% of the full time employee and aslo hairing moro employee and this will creat overall less amount of error to the output of the company. In contrast, the lecturer argues that, 4 days workweek require more investment of the company as the health cost need for the more employee. Moreover, the thraning for the extra new employee will also add extra cost and will cut off the profit of the company.
Secondly, the author contends that, this 4-days workweek will decrease the unemplyeement rate of the country since more and more people will be required to fill the other days for the company. However, the lecture rebuts that, this may not work since the company may offer overtime for the existing employee. Moreover, the setuation can be even worse by raising the unemployeement rate since company will likely to hair those people who want to works 5 days.
Finally, the taxt claims that, the 4-days workweek will inchance the life quality of the employee since they can spend more time with their family and can do their own interst. On the other hand, the listening counters that,while the employee will get more time for laisure, this reduce the life quality of the people since the job market become more unstable and if a sudden economic clash happen, the 4-days worker will likeky to lose their job first. He further adds that, the company will continiously looking for 5 days worker for their important position like managing director to have continious and consistant discession making for the company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | S M Naimul Mamun | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | S M Naimul Mamun | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...as they have to pay only the 80% of the full time employee and aslo hairing moro employee...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'work'.
Suggestion: work
...likely to hair those people who want to works 5 days. Finally, the taxt claims tha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
... other hand, the listening counters that,while the employee will get more time for lai...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 15.1003584229 13% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79881656805 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29809870524 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491124260355 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1910033094 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.454545455 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7272727273 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8181818182 5.45110844103 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164140250371 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783884465943 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092831738555 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117966381638 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676845800798 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.