The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
Given are the two maps delineating transformations in a small theater over a three-year period, commencing from 2010 to 2012.
Perceptibly, the region experienced exponential modifications with elimination of admin and ticket offices along with the addition of two restaurants.
In 2010, from the main entrance in the south east, there was a small café to the right hand side while the ticket and admin office were on the bottom left hand corner. Moreover, on top of this theater was devoted to a media while at the center was the auditorium; strikingly, the stage was between them. Further north-west was a storage.
In 2012, the theater was expanded in size with the appearance of a new media showers was replaced for the storage in the north west, meanwhile, the admin and ticket offices were relocated to make room for two new restaurants in the south west. The new admin office was located on the north of the restaurants and the new ticket office was replaced for a café shop in the bottom right hand side from the main entrance in the south east. In addition, there was a new storage in the north east; along with that, the media was removed to make room for expanding stage and a small hall on the top of the map.
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040 67
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 78
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating transformation...
^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'shower'?
Suggestion: shower
...size with the appearance of a new media showers was replaced for the storage in the no...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of a new media showers was replaced for the storage in the north west, meanwhile...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65437788018 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62456050915 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433179723502 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7092364611 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107765643297 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612317008513 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778693799214 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948123240842 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941824617448 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.