Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
The concept of civil disobidence, the idea that individuals should obey just laws and disobey unjust laws, is not a new idea. First created and used by Henry David Theoreu in the 1800s, civil disobidence has spread around the world to various nations and societies. The result has been the transformations of societies into more just and tolerant ones, which is no doubt a positive transformation. Seeing as how being a part of a society means one must maintain and improve that society (much like how a houseowner must maintain and improve their house if they should live in it), it is logical that those individuals participating in a society have a duty to obey just laws and disobey unjust laws.
Take, for example, the civil rights movement in America during the 1960s. Those who followed the doctorine of Martin Luther King Jr. protested the unjust treatment of African Americans by resisting laws they deemed as unjust. The various resturant sit ins and the unwillingess to give up a bus seat to a white individual are examples of their resistance towards laws that attempted to oppress and demean African Americans. The impact these actions had is well known. Not only did these actions bring attention to their cause, but they eventually lead to the repealling of the very laws they saw as unjust. Had they not done so, America may very well still have those laws in place, thus continuing the oppressetion of minorities. It is clear those who were a part of the civil rights movement were following their duty. They were a part of society that treated their fellow human beings poorly. They knew that they need to take action, otherewise this treatment would continue to affect their children and their children's children. Therefore they had a responsibility to resist these unjust laws, as doing so would allow them to do their duty as an individual part of a society.
Furthurmore, every individual part of a society has a responsibility to obey just laws. Whenever an individual joins a society, they come to an implied agreement (much like the social contract concept developed by Thomas Hobbes) with the other members of the society. The individual agrees to follow the rules of the society in order to reap the benefits of being part of that society. These rules are explicitly stated in the form of laws. As mentioned previously, there are instances where the individual is compelled to resist thoses laws. In those cases, the laws do not accuretly reflect the rules of the society. However, in the case were the laws do accuretly reflect the rules, it is clear those laws are just. In this case, the individual is bound to follow them, due to the implied agreement disscussed earlier. Thus an individual in a society has a responsiblity to obey just laws.
By examining the role an individual has in a society as well as the role of society on the individual, one comes to the realization that the individual is required to obey the just laws and resist the unjust laws. They must do so in order to maintain the ideals of the society they inhabit. If they do not, they reject the society and therefore cannot be a part of the society. Individuals may come and go from a society, but the concept of civil disobidence remains a core tenant of all societies across time and around the globe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1033, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... children and their childrens children. Therefore they had a responsibility to resist the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 821, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e implied agreement disscussed earlier. Thus an individual in a society has a respon...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2738.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 574.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77003484321 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66800456711 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425087108014 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 873.0 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0605513279 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.407407407 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2592592593 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.59259259259 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412679320215 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118403423683 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118987698699 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278163919194 0.150359130593 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608537600212 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.